Managed Security Services 2021: Billing Botheration

Harmony PSA's Ian Thornton-Trump

Ian Thornton-Trump

By Ian Thornton-Trump

This is one of two columns looking ahead at factors that will affect the managed security services market.

As discussed in my companion column, digital and managed-service delivery trend lines point to cloud-migration projects, SaaS-delivered services and security-as-a-service solutions for customer compliance as high-growth opportunities.

Deliver those three together and you’re poised for a great leap forward into expansion and growth — if your business-management processes and systems can keep up.

While native digital service providers weaned on MRR might have a simpler time of it, established MSPs tend to have a wide range of input costs and billing models in use. And if they’re not careful, resellers and DSPs adding their own managed services can fall prey to confusion. If you are going to start delivering migration projects and expand your security services for clients, you must become serious about tracking and managing your business.

Many MSPs have hybrid arrangements, with some customers in a traditional break-fix services model, commonly called Time & Materials (T&M), and others in a “pure-pay” MSP model, which is fixed service, per-seat pricing. As you grow, every customer you bring in the door will have different needs; core services may be at a fixed monthly price, but projects remain T&M. Security add-ons like incident response, which I discuss here, add another layer of pricing confusion, as do those panicked “security 911” calls.

The actual running of an MSP business (and reporting profitability) becomes more complicated when tracking the input costs to service delivery, along with the costs of delivering services themselves.

The more you can deliver in a SaaS model, the better cash flow tends to be. But not every billing scenario falls comfortably into the monthly bucket. The cost of servicing a typical client (or various client profiles) is one of the better metrics against which to measure success. However, when you adjust for different billing models, understanding your profit-and-loss situation, especially per customer, becomes very complicated. Look for a PSA platform that has the flexibility to track, input, manage and distribute costs for, as an example, your RMM or DLP solution across your customer base no matter the billing model, which might be:

  • Arrears billing, generally done for contracted activity that occurred in the previous calendar month. This is a common IT services provider model; however, extremely detailed records are required.
  • Advance billing, generally done for contracted activity that will occur in the month ahead. This is a common MSP “all you can eat” services business model.
  • T&M billing, generally done per incident but can be grouped into per-month or per-quarter batch billing. This is generally done to a set budget expense on a project, but it may also be billed against a down payment for services or hardware. This is generally the most complicated billing method as customers might have different rates, depending on urgency of service or hours of coverage.
  • Pass-through billing, generally done where the cost of service is either directly passed on to the customer as part of a services package. Alternatively, if the service is an “add-on,” such as an email-protection service, it may be linked to the last billing model below.
  • Commission billing or rebate billing is where a SaaS service is provided, but the vendor credits a certain percentage back to the IT services provider in the form of a commission. As an example, the commission of 30 percent on a per-email-box protection solution sold at $3 per mailbox, per month, might only have an actual business cost of $2.10 per mailbox, per month.

To add further complications, there might be …

Pages:  1 2 Next

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The ID is: 101995