A final settlement would be subject to court approval.
Windstream, PAETEC and the other defendants deny all of the allegations in the Consolidated Lawsuit and believe the disclosures in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus are adequate under the law,” Windstream stated Friday in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Nevertheless, Windstream, PAETEC and the other defendants have agreed to settle the Consolidated Lawsuit in order to avoid costly litigation and reduce the risk of any delay to the completion of the merger.”
Among other allegations, the lawsuits filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware claimed that PAETECs board of directors conducted an unfair sales process that resulted in an unfair merger price, according to PAETECs Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The lawsuits further alleged that PAETECs board breached its fiduciary duties by agreeing to the merger and that Windstream aided and abetted in the breach of such fiduciary duties.
Under the terms of the MOU, Windstream and PAETEC also agreed to make certain additional disclosures. For further information on the MOU and the disclosures, click here.
Which brand-new event at Channel Partners Evolution, Oct. 9-12, will you attend? (select up to two)
Total Voters: 22
Find out what the shift to videoconferencing for team communications means for you and your customers. https://t.co/KflEg5o4JJ
October 15 2018 @ 20:26:22 UTC