This site is part of the Global Exhibitions Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 3099067.


Apple 'Shocked' That Samsung 'Copied the iPhone' With Galaxy S

By Daniel Santa Cruz
November 18, 2013 - News

**Editor's Note: Click here for our list of October's hottest selling smartphones to see how the iPhone and Galaxy S4 fared against the competition, or here for our top 10 list of best smartphones in 2013 (so far).**

Samsung can thank Apple for the global success of its popular Galaxy S smartphone line.

So says Phil Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide product marketing, who took the stand Friday to say that it's been harder for his company to sell its iPhones because Samsung infringed on the iconic device's design copyrights.

Apple has been accused of losing its edge on innovation in the smartphone space. Is it because Samsung infringed on its patents?The two smartphone giants are in court, retrying a portion of their patent dispute.

Last year, a jury ruled that Samsung had infringed on Apple's patents and awarded the Silicon Valley giant more than $1 billion. But the judge said the jury miscalculated some of the damages, so she ordered a retrial for about $450 milion of the disputed amount.

Apple's Schiller testified on Friday that Samsung's products "sullied" Apple's reputation, according to The Wall Street Journal.

"It weakens the view that the world has for Apple," Schiller said. Schiller also said that Samsung's products make Apple's customers "question our innovation and design skills in a way that people never used to."

"Apple doesn't own a patent on a product being beautiful or sexy. Isn't that correct?" asked Bill Price, Samsung's attorney, challenging Schiller. "Apple doesn't own the right to preclude the design of this hardware."

Apple says it deserves $350 million while Samsung believes it should only be responsible for $52 million in damages.

comments powered by Disqus
Related News
The new Samsung offerings are available immediately to mobile service practitioners and solution
Edward Gately